Fired Attorney General Pam Bondi Reportedly Seeking Preemptive Pardon From Trump

Former Attorney General Pam Bondi is reportedly pursuing a presidential pardon from Donald Trump just weeks after he fired her, according to sources who say she's "scared" of multiple investigations closing in. The move comes as she faces a House subpoena over DOJ's handling of the Epstein files and mounting ethics complaints -- a stunning admission that Trump's own handpicked AG may need protection from legal consequences.

Source ↗
Fired Attorney General Pam Bondi Reportedly Seeking Preemptive Pardon From Trump

Pam Bondi spent her brief tenure as Attorney General shielding Donald Trump from accountability. Now, according to journalist Rob Shuter, she's begging Trump to shield her.

Sources tell Shuter that Bondi is actively seeking a presidential pardon from the man who fired her on April 2, describing her as "scared" as multiple investigations, lawsuits, and ethics complaints advance. The discussions are "absolutely" happening, though not yet official -- a remarkable development for someone who held the nation's top law enforcement position just weeks ago.

The timing is no coincidence. Bondi was subpoenaed by the House Oversight Committee in March over the Justice Department's stonewalling on the Epstein investigation and transparency compliance. That subpoena, issued while she still ran DOJ, demanded answers about why the department refused to release documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's crimes and connections. Her April 14 deposition date looms, and according to Rep. Nancy Mace, "her subpoena still stands" despite her firing.

This is what preemptive pardons look like in practice: attempting to get ahead of what's coming before prosecutors can build their cases. Bondi knows what she did at DOJ, and apparently she knows it won't look good under oath or in court.

The source's language is telling. Bondi is "attempting to get ahead of what's coming" -- not professing innocence, not claiming political persecution, but trying to outrun consequences. That's the posture of someone who believes they've committed acts that could result in criminal liability.

Bondi's tenure at DOJ was marked by aggressive efforts to protect Trump and his allies while weaponizing the department against perceived enemies. She oversaw the controversial handling of January 6 cases, slow-walked transparency requests, and presided over a department that treated congressional oversight with open contempt. Now she wants Trump to erase any legal jeopardy that conduct might have created.

Representatives Robert Garcia and Nancy Mace have made clear that Bondi's firing doesn't end congressional scrutiny. Garcia, who has been particularly vocal about DOJ's Epstein obstruction, shows no signs of backing down. Mace's statement that the subpoena "still stands" suggests bipartisan interest in getting Bondi's testimony, under oath, about what happened inside Trump's Justice Department.

The pardon pursuit also raises questions about what else Bondi might know. Someone doesn't seek preemptive pardons over minor ethics violations or procedural missteps. They seek them when they believe serious criminal exposure exists -- whether for obstruction, perjury, abuse of office, or other federal crimes.

Trump has shown he's willing to pardon loyalists who protect him. He pardoned January 6 rioters en masse, rewarding violence on his behalf. He's dangled pardons to encourage witness tampering and obstruction. Bondi's calculation appears to be that her brief service as his attorney general -- and her willingness to use that office to shield him -- has earned her a get-out-of-jail-free card.

Whether Trump grants it remains unclear. He fired Bondi unceremoniously, suggesting their relationship soured. But Trump has also demonstrated that loyalty, even failed loyalty, often gets rewarded with pardons when legal heat intensifies.

The broader pattern is unmistakable: Trump surrounds himself with people willing to break laws on his behalf, then uses the pardon power to ensure they face no consequences. Bondi's reported pardon pursuit is just the latest example of how that corrupt bargain works. Do crimes for Trump, then get Trump to erase them.

Congress should not wait to see if Trump pardons Bondi before demanding her testimony. The American people deserve to know what happened at DOJ under her leadership, what she knew about Epstein document suppression, and why she now believes she needs a pardon. Her fear of legal consequences is not a reason to let her off the hook -- it's exactly why her testimony matters.

If Bondi gets her pardon, it will be one more example of Trump using presidential power not to serve justice, but to obstruct it. And if she doesn't, her April 14 deposition could finally provide answers about what Trump's Justice Department was hiding, and why.

Filed under:

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.

Sign in to leave a comment.