Gene Collier: Executive Order No. 58367: Move Straight of Hormuz to Florida

**

The Trump administration has once again threatened Iran with military action, issuing an ultimatum that foreign policy experts say reflects the administration's preference for theatrical confrontation over diplomatic solutions.

According to reporting from the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, the latest round of threats involves an arbitrary deadline for Iranian compliance with demands that remain deliberately vague—a tactic that critics say is designed to manufacture a pretext for military escalation rather than achieve any meaningful policy objective.

A Pattern of Reckless Brinkmanship

This isn't the first time Trump has used threats of military force against Iran as a political tool. The administration withdrew from the Iran nuclear deal in 2018 despite international consensus that the agreement was working to prevent Iranian nuclear weapons development. Since then, Trump has oscillated between threatening "fire and fury" and claiming he wants to negotiate, creating dangerous uncertainty in one of the world's most volatile regions.

The Strait of Hormuz, through which roughly one-fifth of global oil supplies pass, has been a particular flashpoint. Trump's threats to blockade or militarily control the strait would constitute an act of war under international law—but the administration has shown little regard for legal constraints on executive power, whether domestic or international.

Executive Orders as Foreign Policy

The administration's approach to Iran fits a broader pattern of governance by executive order rather than through constitutional processes. Trump has issued hundreds of executive orders bypassing Congress on everything from immigration enforcement to environmental regulations to military deployments. Many of these orders have been challenged in court, but the administration continues to treat presidential decree as a substitute for legislation.

Foreign policy experts warn that this approach is particularly dangerous when it comes to military threats. The Constitution grants Congress the power to declare war, but Trump has repeatedly suggested he has unilateral authority to launch military strikes without congressional authorization.

The Real-World Consequences

While Trump's Iran threats may play well with his base, they have real consequences for American service members, regional stability, and global energy markets. Previous rounds of escalation have brought the United States to the brink of open conflict with Iran, including the January 2020 assassination of Iranian General Qasem Soleimani, which prompted Iranian missile strikes on U.S. bases in Iraq and injured more than 100 American troops.

Military analysts have repeatedly warned that a war with Iran would be far more costly and complex than the Iraq War, potentially drawing in regional powers and destabilizing the entire Middle East. Iran has significant military capabilities, including ballistic missiles, naval forces in the Persian Gulf, and proxy forces throughout the region.

No Strategy, Just Threats

What makes the current round of threats particularly concerning is the absence of any clear strategic objective. The administration has not articulated what it wants Iran to do, what the consequences of non-compliance would be, or what diplomatic off-ramps might exist to prevent escalation.

This approach suggests the threats are less about achieving policy goals and more about projecting strength for domestic political consumption. But foreign policy conducted for the benefit of presidential ego rather than national interest puts American lives and global stability at risk.

Congressional Democrats and some Republicans have called for the administration to brief lawmakers on its Iran strategy and seek authorization before any military action. So far, those calls have been ignored.

The Trump administration's Iran policy remains what it has been since 2017: maximum pressure with no clear endgame, substituting threats for strategy and hoping that bluster alone will force capitulation. History suggests otherwise.