Supreme Court Enables Trump to Erase Bribery Conviction of Cincinnati Politician He Pardoned

The Supreme Court has cleared the path for dismissing the corruption case against former Cincinnati City Council Member P.G. Sittenfeld, who was convicted of bribery and attempted extortion before receiving a pardon from President Trump. The move would erase Sittenfeld's conviction and return his $40,000 fine, rewarding a politician caught on tape promising votes in exchange for campaign cash.

Source ↗
Supreme Court Enables Trump to Erase Bribery Conviction of Cincinnati Politician He Pardoned

The United States Supreme Court has sent a corruption case back to lower courts with instructions that will likely result in the conviction being wiped clean -- all because President Trump decided a convicted briber deserved a second chance.

Former Cincinnati City Council Member P.G. Sittenfeld was found guilty in 2022 of bribery and attempted extortion after investigators caught him promising votes for a development project in exchange for contributions to his political action committee. It was a straightforward pay-to-play scheme: campaign cash for official actions.

A jury heard the evidence and convicted him. He paid a $40,000 fine. The case was closed.

Then Trump pardoned him in January as part of a wave of clemency grants that included January 6 rioters, political allies, and others whose cases caught the former president's attention. Now the Supreme Court has cleared the way for the Justice Department to dismiss the case entirely, which would vacate Sittenfeld's conviction and return his fine.

The high court's order sends the case back to a lower court to consider the Justice Department's motion to throw it out. Given that the motion comes from the executive branch that prosecuted the case in the first place, dismissal appears all but certain.

The Pardon Power as a Get-Out-of-Jail-Free Card

Presidential pardons have always been controversial, but Trump's use of the power has been particularly brazen. He has pardoned political allies, family associates, and people whose cases were promoted by conservative media or wealthy donors. The Sittenfeld pardon fits the pattern: erase the consequences for someone convicted of exactly the kind of corruption Trump himself has been accused of throughout his career.

Sittenfeld was not some wrongly convicted innocent. He was caught in an FBI investigation that documented his willingness to trade official acts for money. The evidence was strong enough to convince a jury beyond a reasonable doubt.

But none of that matters when a president decides to intervene. The pardon power is nearly absolute, and Trump has wielded it without hesitation to benefit people who never should have received clemency.

What Happens Next

If the lower court grants the Justice Department's motion -- and there is no reason to think it will not -- Sittenfeld's conviction will be vacated. He will get his $40,000 back. His criminal record will be cleared.

He will walk away as if the bribery never happened, even though the evidence that he did it remains unchanged. The jury verdict will be erased. The accountability will vanish.

This is what the pardon power looks like when it is used not to correct injustices, but to reward loyalty and protect the corrupt. Sittenfeld's case is one of many, and it will not be the last.

Filed under:

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.

Sign in to leave a comment.