The Mystery of the 'Missing' Trump Epstein Files And What Happens Next - Newsweek

President Donald Trump has been drawn back into the long-running Jeffrey Epstein scandal after the Justice Department said it will this week release tens of thousands of additional documents that were missing from a major disclosure earlier this year.

Nearly 50,000 files have been identified that appeared to be missing from the large January release.

Department of Justice (DOJ) officials say the files were taken "offline for further review" and should be ready for reproduction by the end of the week once redactions are completed.

Some of the documents reportedly contain unverified allegations involving Trump. The Wall Street Journal reported FBI notes from several interviews with a woman who came forward after Epstein's 2019 arrest claiming she had been sexually assaulted by Trump and Epstein in 1983 when she was a minor.

Trump has denied wrongdoing and said he ended his friendship with Epstein and kicked him out of his Mar-a-Lago Club long before Epstein pleaded guilty to procuring a minor for prostitution in 2008. There is no evidence Trump and Epstein knew each other in 1983.

White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson said: "Just as President Trump has said, he's been totally exonerated on anything relating to Epstein."

Why Were the Files Withheld?

The DOJ said in a post on X: "Several individuals and news outlets have recently flagged files related to documents produced to Ghislaine Maxwell in discovery of her criminal case that they claim appear to be missing.

"As with all documents that have been flagged by the public, the department is currently reviewing files within that category of the production." Maxwell, Epstein's longtime confidant, is serving a 20-year prison sentence on a sex trafficking conviction.

Representative Robert Garcia, a Democratic member of the House Oversight Committee, said he had personally reviewed documents that included the allegation of sexual abuse of a minor involving Trump.

In response, the justice department said: "NOTHING has been deleted."

Officials said documents were withheld only if they were duplicates, legally privileged, or connected to ongoing federal investigations.

What Is in the 'Missing' Files?

Garcia said he had reviewed unredacted evidence logs and "can confirm that the DOJ appears to have illegally withheld FBI interviews" with the accuser. He said the unreleased files "make it clear" that a woman "made additional, specific allegations" against Trump.

Recent reports suggest the accuser was interviewed by the FBI four times as agents worked to assess her claims, but only a summary of one interview appeared in the files released publicly.

The apparent gap was first highlighted by journalist Roger Sollenberger in reporting published on Substack and cited by NPR. Since then, multiple news outlets have reported on the missing records, including The New York Times, MSNBC and CNN, raising further questions about why the full set of documents connected to the interviews has not been disclosed.

The FBI did not issue a determination on the credibility of her allegation. The woman was found ineligible for the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program, which awarded settlements to more than 130 victims.

'Unfounded and False' Claims Against Trump

The DOJ released more than 3 million pages of documents related to Epstein on January 30.

"Some of the documents contain untrue and sensationalist claims against President Trump that were submitted to the FBI right before the 2020 election," the department said in a statement last month as it released the records.

"To be clear, the claims are unfounded and false, and if they have a shred of credibility, they certainly would have been weaponized against President Trump already

What Happens Next?

Earlier this week, the committee subpoenaed Attorney General Pam Bondi to testify about the handling of the documents, while Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, who previously had ties to Epstein, has agreed to appear voluntarily.

Democrats on the committee are also weighing whether to seek testimony from Trump himself. They argue that their decision to subpoena Bill and Hillary Clinton over their own links to Epstein establishes a precedent for questioning current or former presidents about their associations with the pedophile.

Even if Trump is never formally called to testify, the expanding investigation could generate renewed political pressure. Each new document release risks prompting fresh scrutiny of Trump’s past relationship with Epstein, including when the two knew each other and the circumstances of their falling out.

As the Justice Department prepares to release tens of thousands of additional files, attention will focus on what new details they reveal. Politically, however, the greater impact may be whether the disclosures reopen uncomfortable questions for Trump about his past association with Epstein: a chapter issue he has long said is closed.

Hey gang, Carlo Versano here. I hope you enjoyed this article. As Newsweek's Director of Politics and Culture and editor of the 1600 *newsletter, I'm keen to hear what you think. Now, *Newsweek *is offering a new service to allow you to communicate *directly** with me in the form of a text message chat. You can sign up and get a direct line to me, as well as the reporters who work for me. You can shape our coverage.

As a Newsweek member, we're offering this service to you for free. You can sign up below, or read more about how it works here. Let's talk!