Trump Crypto Scheme Linked to Sanctioned Criminal Network in Cambodia
World Liberty Financial, the Trump family's cryptocurrency venture, partnered with a blockchain project tied to individuals later sanctioned for involvement in a major transnational criminal organization. Despite claims of due diligence, WLFI appears to have been unaware its partner promoted resorts connected to Cambodia's Prince Group—a network designated by U.S. authorities as a criminal enterprise.
The Trump family's cryptocurrency project is once again raising red flags about who it does business with—and whether anyone is actually checking.
World Liberty Financial (WLFI), the digital token scheme launched by Donald Trump and his sons, has partnered with AB DAO, a Southeast Asian blockchain project with troubling connections. According to an investigation by The Times, AB DAO's flagship project involved multiple individuals who were later sanctioned by the United States and United Kingdom for ties to Cambodia's Prince Group—a network U.S. authorities have designated as a major transnational criminal organization.
WLFI insists it conducted proper due diligence and claims it has "no association whatsoever" with sanctioned individuals. But the investigation reveals the Trump venture had no idea AB DAO had previously promoted resort projects linked to the Prince Group. That is either incompetence or willful ignorance—neither of which inspires confidence in a financial operation selling unregulated tokens to the public.
A Pattern of Pay-to-Play
This is not the first controversy surrounding World Liberty Financial. The project has been criticized from the start as a blatant attempt to monetize the presidency through crypto sales. By selling digital tokens tied to a blockchain platform, the Trump family is effectively creating a new avenue for influence peddling—one that operates outside traditional campaign finance laws and regulatory oversight.
The partnership with AB DAO fits this pattern. Blockchain projects offer a veneer of technological legitimacy while operating in a regulatory gray zone. For someone looking to funnel money to the Trump family, buying tokens or partnering with WLFI provides a convenient mechanism that is harder to trace than a direct payment.
The fact that WLFI's partner had connections to a sanctioned criminal network raises obvious questions: Who else is involved in this venture? What other partnerships has WLFI entered without proper vetting? And why should anyone trust a crypto project run by a family with a documented history of self-dealing and conflicts of interest?
The Prince Group Connection
The Prince Group is not some minor player. U.S. authorities have identified it as a transnational criminal organization involved in money laundering, human trafficking, and other serious crimes. Individuals connected to the group have been sanctioned by both the United States and United Kingdom, meaning American companies and citizens are prohibited from doing business with them.
AB DAO's promotion of resorts tied to the Prince Group suggests either a lack of due diligence on their part—or worse, a willingness to work with entities connected to organized crime. Either way, it is a massive red flag that WLFI missed this connection entirely.
WLFI's defense—that it was unaware of AB DAO's previous activities—does not hold up. If you are launching a financial venture and selling tokens to the public, the bare minimum is knowing who your partners are and what they have been involved in. This is especially true when you are the family of a sitting or former president, where every business deal carries the potential for corruption and influence peddling.
Unregulated and Unaccountable
Cryptocurrency remains one of the least regulated sectors of the financial industry, which is precisely why it appeals to grifters and influence peddlers. Traditional securities are subject to disclosure requirements, anti-money laundering rules, and oversight by agencies like the SEC. Crypto tokens, especially those marketed as "utility tokens" rather than securities, often operate in a legal gray zone with minimal accountability.
World Liberty Financial has positioned itself in this space deliberately. By selling tokens rather than traditional equity or bonds, the Trump family avoids many of the disclosure requirements that would apply to a conventional financial product. This makes it easier to obscure who is buying tokens, how much they are paying, and what they expect in return.
The partnership with AB DAO is a case study in why this matters. Without robust due diligence and regulatory oversight, crypto ventures can easily become vehicles for money laundering, sanctions evasion, and corruption. The fact that WLFI partnered with a project tied to a sanctioned criminal network—and claims it did not know—shows the dangers of operating in this unregulated space.
Selling Access, One Token at a Time
At its core, World Liberty Financial is a pay-to-play scheme. By selling tokens, the Trump family is creating a new way for wealthy individuals and organizations to curry favor and gain access. Unlike campaign contributions, which have limits and disclosure requirements, token purchases can be made anonymously and in unlimited amounts.
This is not speculation. The Trump family has a well-documented history of using business ventures to monetize political power. From foreign governments booking rooms at Trump hotels to lobbyists paying for memberships at Mar-a-Lago, the pattern is clear: access to Trump is for sale, and the family has no qualms about cashing in.
World Liberty Financial takes this to a new level by operating in the largely unregulated crypto space. It is a grift dressed up in blockchain jargon, and the partnership with AB DAO shows just how reckless and poorly vetted this operation really is.
The American public deserves to know who is buying these tokens, how much they are paying, and what they expect in return. Until WLFI provides full transparency—which it almost certainly will not—this venture should be treated as what it is: another Trump family scheme to sell access and enrich themselves at the expense of democratic norms and public trust.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.
Sign in to leave a comment.