Trump Lays Out 'Clear' Aims for Iran Strikes as Pentagon Insists Campaign 'Not Endless'

Trump Lays Out ‘Clear’ Aims for Iran Strikes as Pentagon Insists Campaign ‘Not Endless’

Trump sets sweeping objectives for Operation Epic Fury as Hegseth and Rubio insist the campaign won’t be “endless.” Questions still linger over what success in Tehran means.

US President Donald Trump attends the inaugural meeting of the “Board of Peace” at the US Institute of Peace in Washington, DC, on Feb. 19, 2026. (Photo by SAUL LOEB / AFP)

WASHINGTON DC – US President Donald Trump, in his first live public appearance since the United States launched strikes on Iran under Operation Epic Fury, said the goals of the campaign were “clear,” describing a set of military objectives that include dismantling Iran’s missile capacity, crippling its naval forces, and preventing Tehran from ever acquiring a nuclear weapon – while leaving unanswered the central political question of what “success” looks like in Tehran once the bombing stops.

Speaking at the White House, Trump said the United States was “destroying Iran’s missile capabilities” and vowed to “annihilate” Iran’s navy. He added a third objective: ensuring Iran can never obtain a nuclear weapon.

Trump also framed the operation as an attempt to curtail Iran’s role beyond its borders, arguing the country “cannot continue to arm, fund and direct terrorist armies outside their borders.”

However, he did not explicitly say whether the United States is seeking regime change in Tehran or outline what Washington wants Iran’s political future to look like once the current military objectives are met.

Earlier Monday, US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth sought to tamp down widening fears that the US-Israeli strikes could spiral into a long regional war, telling reporters: “This is not Iraq. This is not endless.”

Trump, Putin, et al. claim to be creating a safer, more predictable world – but, with the ongoing wars in Ukraine, Iran, et al., it’s quite the opposite.

Hegseth described Epic Fury as “the most lethal, the most complex, and most precise aerial operation in history.”

Pressed on whether the US would deploy ground troops, Hegseth rejected calls to define red lines publicly. He called it “foolishness” to lay out exactly what the United States would do, or how long the campaign would last, and said the United States would go “as far as we need to” to achieve its objectives.

He also addressed questions about political intent, saying: “This is not a so-called regime change war, but the regime sure did change, and the world is better off for it.”

Advertisement

Rubio: US acted “preemptively”

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the United States struck Iran “preemptively” on Saturday, arguing Washington acted after determining Israel was poised to launch its own operation – a move he said would have triggered Iranian retaliation against US forces in the region.

“We knew that there was going to be an Israeli action,” Rubio told reporters. “We knew that that would precipitate an attack against American forces.”

Rubio said the administration concluded that without US action first, American casualties would likely have been higher. “And we knew that if we didn’t preemptively go after them before they launched those attacks, we would suffer higher casualties and perhaps even higher those killed,” he said.

He declined to provide operational details, but warned the campaign could intensify.

“I’m not going to give away the details of our tactical efforts,” Rubio said, adding that “the hardest hits are yet to come from the US military.”

Even as US officials emphasize precision strikes and limited aims, the administration is confronting questions about the risk of retaliation and a broader regional conflict.

Advertisement

For now, Washington’s public message is split between Trump’s sweeping language about crushing Iran’s military capacity and senior officials’ insistence that the campaign is not open-ended – while leaving unanswered the central political question of what “success” looks like in Tehran once the bombing stops.

To suggest a correction or clarification, write to us here You can also highlight the text and press Ctrl + Enter

Sevinj Osmanqizi is a journalist covering US foreign policy, security, and geopolitics, with a focus on the broader post-Soviet space. She reports on Washington’s decision-making and its implications for Ukraine and regional stability.

The White House aimed to pressure Ukraine for quick concessions, but instead Europe united against Putin and Trump, and Ukraine’s army became more lethal.