Trump's Civil Rights Chief Gutted the Division She Was Supposed to Lead -- Now She May Get Promoted

Harmeet Dhillon spent her first year as Assistant Attorney General systematically dismantling civil rights enforcement, driving out 75% of career staff and abandoning protections for voters, police brutality victims, and LGBTQ+ Americans. Despite warnings from 200 former DOJ attorneys about the "near destruction" of the Civil Rights Division, she's now being floated as a candidate for Attorney General.

Source ↗
Trump's Civil Rights Chief Gutted the Division She Was Supposed to Lead -- Now She May Get Promoted

The Fox Guarding the Henhouse

When Harmeet Dhillon was confirmed to lead the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division in April 2025, civil rights organizations warned she had "no business" in the role. Her resume spoke for itself: Trump campaign lawyer who pushed election fraud conspiracies, opponent of the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act, serial filer of failed lawsuits against California's voting programs.

One year later, those warnings look prophetic. According to a damning memo from the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, Dhillon hasn't just failed to enforce civil rights law -- she's weaponized the Division against the very people it was created to protect.

Now, with Attorney General Pam Bondi out, conservative commentators are floating Dhillon for a promotion. Her record disqualifies her from managing a Starbucks, let alone the nation's top law enforcement office.

Scorched Earth

The numbers tell the story: 75% of the Civil Rights Division's staff have resigned or been purged since Dhillon took over. In December 2025, more than 200 former Division attorneys signed an open letter describing "near destruction" and a workplace where staff were "demanded to find facts to fit the Administration's predetermined outcomes."

A career attorney with 18 years at DOJ told the San Francisco Standard that Dhillon's agenda represents "the definition of politicization and weaponization." That's not hyperbole -- it's an accurate description of what she's done with the office.

Freeing Police Departments, Abandoning Victims

Dhillon canceled federal consent decrees with the Minneapolis and Louisville police departments -- agreements reached after the murders of George Floyd and Breonna Taylor to address constitutional violations. She closed Biden-era investigations into six additional departments, including Louisiana State Police, Memphis, Phoenix, and Trenton.

The message to police departments nationwide: brutality will go unchecked under this administration.

She withdrew DOJ voting rights lawsuits in Georgia, Virginia, and Alabama, including the challenge to Georgia's 2021 law that civil rights groups argued suppressed Black voter access. She dropped a lawsuit protecting unaccompanied migrant children from sexual abuse, offering no explanation for the dismissal.

When an ICE agent killed U.S. citizen Renee Good, Dhillon refused to open a civil rights investigation. Four senior career officials in the criminal section resigned in protest. The DOJ then moved to investigate Good's widow rather than her killer.

Erasing 50 Years of Civil Rights Law

On the 68th anniversary of the Civil Rights Division's founding, Dhillon finalized a rule eliminating disparate-impact liability from Title VI regulations -- gutting the legal framework that for five decades has underpinned enforcement in housing, lending, and school discipline cases.

She did this without the public notice-and-comment period required by the Administrative Procedure Act. When you're dismantling civil rights protections, apparently due process is optional.

Dhillon even scrubbed the Fair Housing Act from the Division's mission statements, erasing the landmark 1968 law prohibiting discrimination in housing sales and rentals.

Weaponizing the Division Against Diversity

Dhillon has turned the Civil Rights Division into an attack dog against Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion programs -- initiatives designed to advance the actual goals of civil rights laws. She launched investigations into DEI programs at George Mason University, the entire University of California system, and dozens of other federally funded institutions.

The pressure campaign forced the University of Virginia president to resign and cost UVA over $60 million in research grants. She sued Harvard twice -- once over admissions data, once over antisemitism -- with Trump publicly boasting she would make the university "pay a lot of money."

The collateral damage extends far beyond campus politics. Harvard's funding freeze endangered research into cancer, Alzheimer's disease, and climate change, potentially costing the university $1 billion annually. Harvard's legal filings describe grants supporting Parkinson's and Alzheimer's drug development, nanofiber research to protect servicemembers and first responders, and AI systems for cancer diagnosis as casualties of Dhillon's crusade.

Targeting LGBTQ+ Americans

From day one, Dhillon refocused the Division's mission to include opposition to transgender rights, replacing enforcement priorities on employment discrimination and housing. The Division intervened in two Georgia prison cases to oppose gender-affirming care for transgender inmates and joined a lawsuit against Loudoun County, Virginia schools over transgender student policies.

Former U.S. Attorney Barbara McQuade wrote that under Dhillon, the Division has been recast to "attack the very interests it once protected." That's not a bug -- it's the entire point.

Disqualified for Promotion

Dhillon came into office with a record of undermining civil rights. She's spent a year proving her critics right, systematically dismantling enforcement mechanisms, driving out career staff, and redirecting resources toward partisan culture war battles.

The idea that this performance warrants promotion to Attorney General is obscene. Then again, in an administration where corruption is currency and authoritarianism is policy, maybe it makes perfect sense.

Civil rights organizations warned us about Harmeet Dhillon. We should have listened then. We definitely shouldn't promote her now.

Filed under:

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.

Sign in to leave a comment.