White House Sets July 4 Deadline for Crypto Bill as Gillibrand Demands Ethics Clause Targeting Trump Family Profits

The White House wants Congress to pass the sweeping Digital Asset Market CLARITY Act by Independence Day, aiming to regulate the booming crypto market. Senator Kirsten Gillibrand is holding up the bill without a strict ethics provision banning senior officials—including President Trump—from cashing in on crypto ventures tied to their office.

Source ↗
White House Sets July 4 Deadline for Crypto Bill as Gillibrand Demands Ethics Clause Targeting Trump Family Profits

The White House is pushing hard for Congress to pass the Digital Asset Market CLARITY Act by July 4, 2026, marking a symbolic deadline that coincides with America’s 250th anniversary. Patrick Witt, executive director of the President’s Council of Advisors for Digital Assets, laid out an aggressive timeline at the Consensus Miami conference: Senate Banking Committee markup this month, four working Senate weeks in June for floor votes, and a House vote before Independence Day.

The CLARITY Act is the most ambitious crypto legislation in U.S. history, designed to create a comprehensive regulatory framework dividing oversight between the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). The House already passed its version with overwhelming bipartisan support last year. Meanwhile, the stablecoin market has surged 49 percent since the GENIUS Act passed, ballooning to $306 billion by the end of 2025.

But the bill faces a critical roadblock in the Senate. Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), a key advocate for the legislation, has made it clear she will not support the bill unless it includes an ethics clause that bars senior government officials from profiting off crypto. This demand is widely understood as a direct shot at former President Donald Trump and his family, who have launched multiple crypto ventures including memecoins and the DeFi project World Liberty Financial. Bloomberg estimates these ventures have generated at least $1.4 billion in revenue, leveraging the presidency to enrich themselves through unregulated digital assets.

The White House has pushed for a broader ethics provision that would apply generally rather than targeting any single officeholder. Meanwhile, bipartisan lawmakers have made progress on other contentious issues, such as stablecoin yield. Senators Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) and Angela Alsobrooks (D-Md.) proposed a compromise banning passive yield on stablecoin balances while allowing activity-based rewards, a deal Gillibrand acknowledged might hold because it leaves everyone unhappy.

Despite these advances, Gillibrand warned that ethics, consumer protection, and illicit finance provisions must be resolved within days to keep the markup on schedule. She predicts a final vote by early August if talks succeed, but the clock is ticking.

This showdown highlights the ongoing struggle to hold powerful figures accountable in the wild west of cryptocurrency — especially when those figures include the former president and his family, who have exploited digital finance for personal gain. The CLARITY Act could bring much-needed oversight to a market rife with pay-to-play schemes and political favors, but only if Congress stands firm against corruption and rejects watered-down ethics rules.

The coming weeks will reveal whether lawmakers have the backbone to stop the Trump family crypto grift or if they will let another scandal slide under the radar in the name of political expediency. We’ll be watching closely.

Filed under:

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.

Sign in to leave a comment.