Why Donald Trump gambled in Iran - The Economist
The United States, in coordination with Israel, launched a series of missile and bombing strikes against Iran on February 28th under President Donald Trump. The strikes carry significant uncertainty, with outcomes ranging from a new Iranian government willing to negotiate peace to potential chaos and further violence. Trump has proceeded with the military action despite acknowledged risks within the Pentagon and his own administration, framing the move as a demonstration of American military power intended to send a message to adversaries globally.
Leaders| War in the Middle East
Why Donald Trump gambled in Iran
The disruptor-in-chief wants to send a message to enemies everywhere by demonstrating the devastating nature of American power
A LONG LIST of American presidents has come to grief in the Middle East. Despite their travails, on the morning of February 28th Donald Trump struck Iran with wave after wave of missiles and bombs. As everyone knows—including the Pentagon and members of his administration—the outcome of the war is highly uncertain. The strikes, undertaken with Israel, could usher in a new Iranian government ready to make peace; but they could also lead to chaos and further bloodshed. Regardless, Mr Trump has enthusiastically taken the gamble.
Brazil’s almighty Supreme Court must win back public trust
Recent scandals have tarnished the image of one of Brazil’s most important democratic institutions
America’s states should beware of copying Europe too much
Welfare is rightly becoming more generous. But regulatory fragmentation is a problem
Heathrow’s third runway is turning into another infrastructure fiasco
The government must step in
Donald Trump is at risk of launching a war without purpose
A conflict with Iran without a clear objective would be recklessly dangerous
America’s dangerous pursuit of critical-mineral dominance
With a more focused approach, it could break China’s chokehold
The right response to private-market dangers
Was a Blue Owl fund mismanaged, or did it reveal fundamental problems about the industry?
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.
Sign in to leave a comment.