January 6th, election interference, acts of authoritarianism, voter suppression, and systematic undermining of democratic institutions.
Stories
US President Trump criticized several Supreme Court justices as a “disgrace” after the court, in a 6-3 decision, struck down tariffs he issued in 2025, ruling that he lacked the authority to enact them under the law used. Trump described the court's rejection as “deeply disappointing.”
The US Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that most of Donald Trump's tariffs were illegal, criticizing their legal basis under a 1977 law, marking the first invalidation of his second-term policies. In response, Trump condemned the justices, calling them "fools" and "disloyal," and signed an executive order imposing a 10% global tariff, which was set to take effect on February 24. This decision and the reaction highlight ongoing tensions over Trump's trade policies and judicial authority.
After losing a case at the Supreme Court, Donald Trump announced plans to implement global tariffs again by leveraging authorities under the 1974 Trade Act. He initiated these steps late Friday.
President Donald Trump publicly criticized the six Supreme Court justices who voted to strike down his administration's global tariffs, calling them "absolutely ashamed" and suggesting they lacked the courage to do what is right. He also alleged that the court was influenced by foreign interests and targeted his appointees, Justices Gorsuch and Coney Barrett, as an "embarrassment," while praising Justices Thomas, Alito, and Kavanaugh for siding with him. The ruling marked a significant setback for Trump's economic policies, and his reaction was notably personal and combative.
President Trump has signed an order imposing a 'temporary' 10 percent global tariff using Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, which authorizes the president to impose tariffs up to 15 percent to address significant trade concerns.
The U.S. Supreme Court invalidated President Trump's use of emergency powers to impose tariffs, ruling 6-3 that the Constitution grants Congress authority over taxation, including tariffs. Trump criticized the decision and announced his intention to use alternative statutes to implement tariffs, despite limited legal authority under those laws. The ruling also leaves unresolved whether businesses can recover the tariffs paid, with lower courts tasked with addressing refund procedures. The decision highlighted the Court's vigilance in fiscal matters and revealed ongoing divisions among the justices.
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that President Trump exceeded his authority in imposing tariffs using a law intended for national emergencies, invalidating the "Liberation Day" tariffs on Canada and Mexico. Vermont Treasurer Mike Pieciak welcomed the decision, stating it prevents unlawful tax increases that impacted American businesses and consumers, although the harm caused by the tariffs cannot be undone. The tariffs resulted in over $120 billion collected from businesses and consumers, leading to layoffs and higher prices.
The article criticizes the current U.S. government as a kakistocracy, characterized by rule by the least qualified and most unscrupulous individuals, exemplified by former President Trump and his administration. It highlights instances of misinformation and violence, including the deaths involving ICE agents, and accuses federal officials of misleading the public about these events. The author warns of the potential threat to democracy posed by efforts to interfere with or cancel upcoming midterm elections and advocates for Democratic gains in Congress to prevent further abuses and pursue accountability.
The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that former President Trump's emergency global tariffs were unlawful, according to Georgetown Law Professor Gregory Shaffer.
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that former President Trump exceeded his authority in using emergency powers to impose tariffs without congressional approval, invalidating the tariffs as illegal. California Governor Gavin Newsom urged Trump to refund billions of dollars collected from these tariffs, describing them as an illegal cash grab that harmed consumers and businesses. The ruling did not specify how refunds should be handled, but potential claims could amount to up to $170 billion. Trump indicated he would impose a new tariff and launch investigations, while other state officials, such as New York Governor Kathy Hochul, supported refunds to residents.
Former President Donald Trump announced plans to sign an order imposing a 10% global tariff under section 122, in addition to existing tariffs. He also criticized Supreme Court justices, though specific details are not provided in the summary.
Following the Supreme Court's ruling that his sweeping tariffs are illegal, former President Donald Trump claimed, "I can do anything I want, I could do anything to them (countries)... I'm allowed to destroy the country." The post garnered significant attention, with 19,000 votes and 1,600 comments.