January 6th, election interference, acts of authoritarianism, voter suppression, and systematic undermining of democratic institutions.
Stories
The Wall Street Journal's editorial board criticized President Trump's reaction to the Supreme Court's ruling curbing his tariff powers, describing his response as a damaging meltdown that could incite violence. They called for unity from the Justices and attributed the court's decision to Trump's own actions rather than judicial overreach.
The article reports that JPMorgan Chase acknowledged closing Donald Trump's and his businesses’ accounts after the January 6 attack in a court filing related to Trump's lawsuit, which alleges the closures were politically motivated. Trump’s lawyers accuse JPMorgan of unlawful and intentional debanking that caused financial harm, while JPMorgan denies the allegations and disputes the case's validity.
The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that the 1977 law Trump relied on does not authorize broad tariffs, leading Trump to impose a new 10% tariff effective February 24 for 150 days, with certain exemptions. The decision limits Trump's tariff powers and could result in refunds for affected companies, though the process is complex and uncertain.
President Trump condemned the Supreme Court's ruling against his tariffs and expressed intentions to implement new global tariffs. The ruling was seen as a major obstacle to his trade strategy.
The Supreme Court ruled that President Donald Trump violated federal law by unilaterally imposing sweeping tariffs globally. Chief Justice John Roberts, who authored the majority opinion, explained the decision in court. This ruling represents a significant setback for the White House on a key issue of foreign policy and economics.
Most of Trump's tariffs were invalidated by the Supreme Court, which ruled they exceeded legal authority. Trump responded by raising the global tariff to 15%, implemented under the 1974 Trade Act, and announced investigations into trading partners for possible tariffs.
The U.S. Supreme Court delivered a significant decision against former President Trump regarding tariffs, creating ongoing legal uncertainties as he considers alternative legal options. The case's implications highlight the continued legal battles surrounding tariffs and trade policies.
JPMorgan Chase has acknowledged for the first time that it closed President Donald Trump's and his businesses' bank accounts after the Jan. 6 attack, according to a court filing in a lawsuit where Trump claims the closures were politically motivated. The lawsuit accuses the bank of unlawfully de-banking Trump and his companies, causing financial harm, amid broader debates over political bias and bank de-platforming.
Following a Supreme Court decision that struck down his tariffs as exceeding his authority, Donald Trump imposed a new 15% global tariff. The court ruled that tariff authority is Congress's, not the President's, and did not decide on refunds for past tariffs. Business groups are calling for refunds of approximately $133 billion collected previously.
Stephen Colbert stated that CBS pulled his interview with Texas Democrat James Talarico due to fears it might violate FCC equal-time rules under a guidance from the Trump administration. CBS disputed this, saying their attorneys merely provided legal guidance on the matter. Talarico and other candidates are participating in heated Texas primary races, with early voting beginning amid political tensions.
The article claims that Pam Bondi was involved not to deliver justice but to conceal alleged crimes of Donald Trump, as discussed in a post by Lincoln Project on Instagram.
A court prevented the Pentagon from punishing Senator Mark Kelly for a video urging troops to resist unlawful orders, citing free speech protections. The judge criticized the Pentagon's actions and suggested Kelly is likely to succeed on the merits of his case, with the Pentagon planning an appeal.