President Trump just started a dangerous, pointless war against Iran
The war is not the result of deliberations or consultation. It is the impulsive decision of one man—like dictators do.
Russia ties, secret dealings with dictators, and putting foreign interests over American ones.
Stories
The war is not the result of deliberations or consultation. It is the impulsive decision of one man—like dictators do.
By Bo Erickson, Jasper Ward, Patricia Zengerle and Erin Banco PALM BEACH, Florida, Feb 28 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump said on Saturday there could be U.S. casualties after he announced the United States conducted "major combat operations" i...
As President Donald Trump launched military strikes in Iran from Mar-a-Lago, Vice President JD Vance and a group of the president's advisors monitored the mission from the White House.
The article content is not fully accessible as it requires JavaScript to load. Based on the available snippet, it references JD Vance being present in the Situation Room with Secretaries Wright and Bessent and DNI Gabbard for monitoring activities, as reported by journalist Sophia Cai. No further details from the article can be confirmed due to the content being blocked.
Photos show President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance in the Situation Room and at Mar-a-Lago during U.S. military operations in Iran.
Chilling photos show the tense moments President Trump and Vice President Vance orchestrated the monumental strikes on Iran while hundreds of miles apart.
Several members of Trump’s cabinet have previously spoken out against foreign interventions
Right-wing Americans who once relished President Donald Trump's promises of ending foreign military adventures are now furious that bombs are raining down on Iran.
Several members of Trump’s cabinet have previously spoken out against foreign interventions
Key members of Congress are demanding a swift war powers resolution vote to restrain President Trump's military strikes on Iran, which were launched jointly with Israel without formal congressional authorization. Bipartisan legislators in both chambers — including Democrats and a small number of Republicans — argue the action is unconstitutional, as the Constitution grants Congress the power to declare war. Most Republican leaders, however, have backed Trump's decision, citing Iran's nuclear program and missile capabilities as justification. Even if a war powers resolution passed the narrowly divided Congress, it would likely be vetoed by Trump, making any such vote largely symbolic but still significant as a public record.
The Trump administration launched military strikes against Iran without congressional approval, a public rationale, or a coherent strategy for what should follow, particularly regarding the future of the Iranian people and government. The piece notes that U.S. policy has long oscillated between coercion and engagement with Iran without addressing the root issue of the regime's ideology, and that the current administration has actively dismantled tools — such as funding for human rights monitors, Radio Farda, and internet freedom programs — that could support a democratic transition. Critics and opposition figures warn that bombing alone will not produce a stable successor government, especially given the absence of a recognized or unified Iranian opposition. The author argues that for lasting regional stability, the U.S. must support Iranian self-determination and pluralist governance rather than simply targeting the regime militarily.
An official said that despite the massive military buildup by the United States, there were limits to the air defense systems that had been rushed into the region.