Hegseth isn't done targeting Mark Kelly, despite legal defeat and DOJ moving on - MS NOW

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth escalated his investigation into Senator Mark Kelly despite losing a court case that blocked him from penalizing Kelly for his speech. After winning a legal challenge on First Amendment grounds, Kelly criticized Hegseth for continuing to appeal the ruling, which Kelly said violates free speech rights and suggests an unwillingness to accept the legal defeat. Hegseth's ongoing actions highlight his refusal to cease targeting Kelly even after a federal judge's decision.

Source ↗
Hegseth isn't done targeting Mark Kelly, despite legal defeat and DOJ moving on - MS NOW

In mid-December, the Pentagon announced that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth was “escalating” his crusade against Sen. Mark Kelly, launching an “official Command Investigation” into the Arizona Democrat after he appeared in a video urging service members not to follow illegal orders. It was, as The Washington Post noted, an “unprecedented use of the military justice system to investigate a political adversary.”

In the weeks that followed, the campaign intensified. In January, the beleaguered Pentagon chief issued a “letter of censure” to the decorated Navy veteran, calling it a first step toward a demotion and a decrease in pension. Kelly pushed back in court, filing a lawsuit against Hegseth, arguing that the Cabinet secretary’s crusade violates the senator’s First Amendment rights and the speech-and-debate clause of the Constitution, which protects lawmakers from prosecution for official acts.

Not surprisingly, Kelly won. U.S. District Judge Richard Leon, a George W. Bush-appointed jurist, blocked Hegseth from penalizing Kelly.

“Secretary Hegseth relies on the well-established doctrine that military servicemembers enjoy less vigorous First Amendment protections given the fundamental obligation for obedience and discipline in the armed forces,” Leon wrote.

“Unfortunately for Secretary Hegseth, no court has ever extended those principles to retired servicemembers, much less a retired servicemember serving in Congress and exercising oversight responsibility over the military,” the judge said. “This Court will not be the first to do so!”

At that point, the smart move would’ve been for the Pentagon chief to call it a day and shift his focus back to all of his other enormous responsibilities. The former Fox News host did not, however, make the smart move. Politico reported:

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Tuesday ramped up his public spat with Sen. Mark Kelly, appealing a federal court ruling that blocked him from punishing the Arizona Democrat for advising troops not to follow illegal orders. […]

The move reveals that Hegseth has no plans to tamp down his battle against Kelly, a potential 2028 presidential contender who has fought the allegations against him as a threat to free speech.

In a statement, Kelly said, “These guys don’t know when to quit. … A federal judge told Donald Trump and Pete Hegseth that they violated my constitutional rights and chilled the free speech of millions of retired veterans. There is only one reason to appeal that ruling: to keep trampling on the free speech rights of retired veterans and silence dissent.”

Filed under: Attacks on Democracy

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.

Sign in to leave a comment.