Pam Bondi isn't here to bring justice - YouTube
The article asserts that Pam Bondi was not appointed to pursue justice but was instead brought in to conceal Donald Trump's alleged crimes, as discussed in The Breakdown on their channel.
January 6th, election interference, acts of authoritarianism, voter suppression, and systematic undermining of democratic institutions.
Stories
The article asserts that Pam Bondi was not appointed to pursue justice but was instead brought in to conceal Donald Trump's alleged crimes, as discussed in The Breakdown on their channel.
The article discusses former President Donald Trump's reaction, describing it as a temper tantrum, following the Supreme Court's decision against his emergency tariffs. Contributors Tim Miller and Sonny Bunch provide their perspectives on Trump's behavior after the ruling.
U.S. President Donald Trump stated that $175 billion in tariff revenue is now "in limbo" after the Supreme Court struck down his global tariffs. The court's decision has affected the collection of these tariffs, raising questions about whether the government will refund the revenue.
During a press conference, former President Donald Trump launched a conspiracy-laden attack on the Supreme Court for upholding the legality of his tariffs, claiming they were influenced by foreign interests and political opponents. Despite the court ruling that his tariffs violated the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, Trump insisted he could continue imposing them and blamed the decision for economic uncertainty. His claims about a strong economy and tariffs' effectiveness are contradicted by recent economic data and public polls showing disapproval of his trade policies.
President Donald Trump expressed strong disapproval of the Supreme Court's decision to strike down his tariffs, blaming the court and promising to implement a temporary 10% global tariff under alternate legal powers. He criticized the justices he appointed, particularly Amy Coney Barrett and Neil Gorsuch, and indicated plans to pursue tariffs through other legal means despite the court ruling. Trump’s administration is scrambling to compensate for the setback, with some allies suggesting that backing down could improve midterm prospects, while others emphasize continuing efforts to pursue broader tariff policies.
President Donald Trump imposed an additional 10 percent global tariff on imports into the United States following a Supreme Court decision that invalidated some of his earlier tariffs.
The US Supreme Court ruled that Donald Trump’s tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) are illegal, but did not address other trade policy tools, leaving uncertainty for international businesses. The ruling was met with mixed reactions, with US business groups welcoming increased legal clarity and European, Canadian, and Indian officials calling for stability while noting potential future trade disruptions. The White House indicated it would replace the tariffs through other means, and international stakeholders continue to monitor US trade policy developments.
Malcolm Nance, a former US Navy terrorism expert and MSNBC counterterrorism analyst, discussed the January 6th Capitol insurrection and its implications for democracy on the Mea Culpa podcast. He also discussed his latest book, “They Want to Kill Americans,” which explores the militias, terrorists, and ideologies behind the Trump insurgency and earlier extremist activities.
State lawmakers in Annapolis are considering a bill that would prohibit individuals convicted of involvement in the Jan. 6, 2021 Capitol attack, as well as those pardoned by President Trump, from serving on state boards, committees, or similar groups. The bill, Senate-sponsored and referred to a committee, has prominent supporters including Senate President Bill Ferguson.
The article discusses efforts by Republican politicians, including former President Trump, to exclude noncitizens and undocumented immigrants from the 2030 Census calculations, aiming to reduce the political influence of non-White populations and urban centers. Research indicates that such exclusions would weaken minority citizens' representation and shift power toward rural and exurban areas with more White residents. These initiatives are part of broader strategies to diminish minority political power and affect the allocation of congressional and electoral votes, raising concerns about their impact on demographic representation and voting rights.
The discussion covers the Supreme Court’s tariff ruling, which limited President Trump’s ability to unilaterally implement tariffs, highlighting issues of executive overreach and congressional authority. Trump criticized the ruling and attacked the justices, prompting concerns about potentially undermining the judiciary. The panel also addressed Trump's recent international efforts, the handling of Gaza aid, and reflected on the legacy of civil rights leader Jesse Jackson.
President Donald Trump indicated he does not intend to refund tariff fees collected by the US government following the Supreme Court's ruling overturning his "Liberation Day" global tariffs.