Life Under Rockets. J.D. Vance's Iran Dilemma. Plus. . . - The Free Press
J.D. Vance’s Iran dilemma. Why men love to ‘monitor the situation.’ The coming AI happiness dividend. And more in today's Front Page.
Russia ties, secret dealings with dictators, and putting foreign interests over American ones.
Stories
J.D. Vance’s Iran dilemma. Why men love to ‘monitor the situation.’ The coming AI happiness dividend. And more in today's Front Page.
By LISA LERER and KATIE GLUECKDemocrats have overwhelmingly opposed President Donald Trump’s decision to strike Iran without seeking congressional approval. But in significant if subtle ways, the attacks have magnified fissures in the party over the country’s national security interests and America’s use of military force in the Middle East.The questions many Democrats are raising over whether Trump was justified in launching the attacks deepened Sunday after the first American casualties were a
Recent U.S. strikes in Iran have split public opinion and Congress.
What's the strategy? Fears of a power vacuum. 10 countries targeted. Congress braces for a fight.
Madeleine Finlay speaks to technology journalist Chris Stokel-Walker, who explains why he thinks this moment represents a dangerous turning point for the use of artificial intelligence in conflicts
Roughly 2,500 years of catastrophic warfare are not enough to teach Steven Miller and other Trump administration leaders.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio came under fire for his comments trying to justify the Trump administration and Israel's war on Iran.
After months of diplomacy, US President Donald Trump concluded that only decisive action would prevent Iran from reaching the brink of a nuclear weapon, Vice President J.D. Vance has said. Vance, in an interview with Fox News on Monday, said the President believed time was running out despite prolonged engagement with Tehran. Referring to Operation […]
In 1981, then Senate Majority Leader Howard Baker famously called President Reagan’s proposal for a 25% cut in the income tax a “riverboat gamble.” …
The US State Department urged US citizens leave the Middle East immediately. Follow for live coverage.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio offered a new rationale for why the U.S. attacked Iran now.
Marco Rubio said Monday during a press briefing that the U.S. had to strike Iran because they would have been able to launch missiles in a year and a half.